Legal Opinion

In Re Farm. State Bk. of Amherst

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1939No. File No. 8253PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On March 18, 1936, the superintendent of banks took possession of the business and property of the Farmers State Bank of Amherst for the purpose of liquidation. Plaintiff commenced this action against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, claiming that he is entitled to be reimbursed for bonds wrongfully converted by the bank. Four separate causes of action are set forth in the complaint. The circuit court found in favor of the defendant upon the claim set forth as a first cause of action, and defendant admitted liability upon the fourth cause of action. From the judgment for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Tyler County State Bank v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Bloomheart v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. StrainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. International Refugee Organization v. Maryland Drydock Co. The San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. Knock v. KnockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Schwartzle v. DaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hedges v. HedgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API