Legal Opinion

Buxcel v. First Fidelity Bank

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice (on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] When Buxcels were looking for a business to buy, First Fidelity Bank encouraged them to purchase a grocery store from its customers, the Fabers. A bank officer told them they could earn “a good living” in the business. Buxcels bought the store, pledging their farm and home as collateral. First Fidelity financed the purchase and prepared the SBA guaranteed loan application. After the store failed, Buxcels learned that First Fidelity knew Fabers had chronic cash flow problems and that the bank had threatened foreclosure. Buxcels brought suit, asserting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Estate of DuebendorferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Burhenn v. Dennis Supply Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schwaiger v. Mitchell Radiology Associates, P.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Klutman v. Sioux Falls StormSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Imo the Estate of Adrian J. Folcher, Jr. (074590)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API