Speight v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover damages for the negligent killing of the plaintiff's intestate.
The jury returned the following verdict:
1. Was the plaintiff's intestate, Arthur Speight, injured and killed by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.
2. Did the plaintiff's intestate, by his own negligence, contribute to his own injury and death, as alleged in the defendant's answer? Answer: Yes.
3. If so, notwithstanding the contributory negligence of the plaintiff's intestate, could the defendant, by the exercise of ordinary care, have avoided the injury and death?…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Wilson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State v. . MaloneeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armentrout v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958