Legal Opinion

Speight v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for the negligent killing of the plaintiff's intestate.

The jury returned the following verdict:

1. Was the plaintiff's intestate, Arthur Speight, injured and killed by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. Did the plaintiff's intestate, by his own negligence, contribute to his own injury and death, as alleged in the defendant's answer? Answer: Yes.

3. If so, notwithstanding the contributory negligence of the plaintiff's intestate, could the defendant, by the exercise of ordinary care, have avoided the injury and death?…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Wilson v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. . MaloneeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armentrout v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API