Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Bill to enjoin the prosecution of proceedings to open a boulevard across complainant's tracks. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
This is a bill in equity to enjoin the defendants from prosecuting proceedings to open the boulevard across the complainant's tracks. The case was heard upon pleadings and proofs, and the bill dismissed.-
We think the decree correct, for the reason that the questions are purely legal, and can be disposed of upon the law side of the court. The condemnation proceedings have been prosecuted to a determination, which was adverse to the complainant. It has appealed to this *445CÍourt, which appeal is now pending. The questions raised will be disposed of in that case.
The main ground npon which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winkler v. WinklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Chicago & N. W. R. Co. v. Chicago & P. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1874
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Williams v. Elting Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sandusky Grain Co. v. Sanilac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915