Legal Opinion

Suzuki v. Holthaus

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1985No. 84-644PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an action for malpractice brought by the plaintiffs, Peter T. Suzuki and Carol J. Suzuki, against Roger R. Holthaus and Robert H. Petersen as defendants. The action was originally filed only against Holthaus. The second amended petition, filed December 18, 1981, added Petersen as a defendant. Petersen’s amended answer, filed May 17, 1983, alleged that the action was barred by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-222 (Reissue 1979).

The defendants moved for a separate trial as to the issue of the statute of limitations, and, after a trial to the court, the trial court found that the action was barred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Interholzinger v. Estate of DentNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Suzuki v. Gateway Realty of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gordon v. ConnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Zion Wheel Baptist Church v. HerzogNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API