Legal Opinion
Presnick v. Bysiewicz
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 22, 2003No. 3:02 CV 1657 GLGPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss all claims asserted by plaintiff Daniel V. Presnick in his complaint. For the reasons stated below, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 7).
I. Procedural History and Facts
On September 18 2002, plaintiff Daniel V. Presnick [“Presnick”], acting pro se, filed a two-count complaint against Susan Bysiewicz, the Secretary of the State of Connecticut. Plaintiff, founder of the Orange [CT] Taxpayers’ Party, alleges that defendant, in her official capacity,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Polidi v. BannonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- State v. RochonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Jones v. CITY SCHOOL DIST. OF NEW ROCHELLEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Lewis v. KohlerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Townsend v. CastilloDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.