Legal Opinion

Marcy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2018No. 7306 S-16617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A borough resident filed suit against the borough and citizens who had sponsored a borough ballot initiative prohibiting commercial marijuana businesses. The suit, filed 32 days before the borough election, sought declaratory and injunctive relief that the initiative was unconstitutional and unlawful and should be removed from the election ballot. Given the imminent election, the superior court ordered the case held in abeyance pending the initiative vote's outcome. After borough voters rejected the initiative, the court dismissed the case as moot.

The borough…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Harry N. Young, Jr. v. State of Alaska Office of Lieutenant Governor, Lieutenant Governor Kevin Meyer, in an official capacity Division of Elections, and Director Gail Fenumiai, in an official capacityAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API