Legal Opinion

Nimmo v. Fitzgerald

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The complaint in this action alleges the execution by defendants to plaintiff of two promissory notes, each for $2,000; a payment of $1,000 on account of the first note and the balance of $3,000, plus interest and attorney fees, due, owing, and unpaid.

It appears that in 1923 plaintiff and one Shattuek, owners of Shattuek & Nimmo Warehouse Company, a corporation, entered into a written agreement for the sale of all the capital stock of said corporation, $30,000 par value, to defendants, at a purchase price of $34,000, payable in deferred payments represented by promissory notes, the last two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hill v. BadeljyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Calpetro Producers Syndicate v. Chas M. Woods Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. El Zarape Tortilla Factory, Inc. v. Plant Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Winner v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Columbia Casualty Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API