Fulton County Employees Pension Board v. Askea
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
1. Where a legislative act is plain, unambiguous and positive, and not capable of two constructions, the act must be taken to mean what it says, and judicial interpretation is forbidden. Board of Tax Assessors of Decatur County v. Catledge, 173 Ga. 656 (160 S. E. 909); Floyd County v. Salmon, 151 Ga. 313 (106 S. E. 280); Gazan v. Heery, 183 Ga. 30 (1) (187 S. E. 371, 106 A. L. R. 498).
2. A provision of the Fulton County Pension Law (Ga. L. 1941, p. 843 as amended by Ga. L. 1947, p. 631) as follows: “Any such officer . . . who is not otherwise entitled to a pension under this law and who has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gazan v. HeerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Board of Tax-Assessors v. CatledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Floyd County v. SalmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Fenster v. Gulf States CeramicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Crowe v. Holloway Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Crowe v. Holloway Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.