Conor v. Flick

The appellant, Edna Conor, appeals on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in favor of Harry Flick, appellee. Her action was for personal injuries claimed to have been proximately caused by the negligence of Flick and Clarence R. Schassberger. Sehassberger, who lived in Cleveland, was not served with summons and the trial proceeded as to Flick alone.

On July 19,1937, at about 12:55 p. m., Flick was proceeding in his automobile easterly on Nebraska avenue in Toledo and Schassberger in his automobile was proceeding southerly on Division street. Flick testified that he…