Legal Opinion
Van Tassel v. Sullivan
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided April 24, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-K-1177PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING RULE 59(E) MOTION
KANE, Senior District Judge.
On February 3, 1992,1 entered judgment in favor of the Plaintiff, reversing and remanding this case to the Secretary for further proceedings to include a full vocational assessment of the Plaintiff.
On February 25, 1992, counsel for the Plaintiff filed a petition for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). The Secretary responded to the petition on March 11, 1992. Although conceding that my February 3 judgment was a “sentence four” remand under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, —…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Welter v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Gutierrez v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Parsons v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bodner v. SullivanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992