Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Sullivan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 9, 1992No. C2-89-985PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kemp de novo in light of the defendant’s objections. The Court finds the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to be well reasoned and hereby accepts it in whole pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly it is hereby ordered:
1. That the Secretary’s response to the EAJA petition filed by plaintiff, construed as a motion to dismiss the application on grounds that it was not timely filed, be denied.
2. That the Clerk enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff based upon the receipt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Misciagno v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Boronat v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Van Tassel v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Leclerc v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996