Legal Opinion

Bodner v. Sullivan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 27, 1992No. C-90-0880 RFPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PECKHAM, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff applies for an award of attorney’s fees against the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A).

In March, 1990, plaintiff filed his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Secretary’s decision that he did not become disabled until January 1989. In June, defendant answered the complaint, and in August the parties and this Court signed a Stipulation and Order of Remand, the effect of which was a remand of the case to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Fernandez v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
Childs v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004