Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
Appellant, Sarah Smith, appeals the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (Farm Bureau). Mrs. Smith appeals the trial court’s decision that the phrase “you or any member of your family residing in your household” in an insurance policy was not ambiguous, and that there was no question of material fact concerning the terms of the policy’s underinsured-motorist clause.
On November 29, 1999, Sarah Glass, now Sarah Smith, was injured when Melbern Samuels struck a vehicle in which Mrs. Smith was a passenger. Mr.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Unigard Security Insurance v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Worthey Ex Rel. WortheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Spears v. City of FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Essex Insurance v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- James Dowden v. Cornerstone National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Northland Casualty Co. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Nichols v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Lori Allenbrand Tri-State Traffic Control, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.