Legal Opinion

Waddle v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1990No. 8918SC1031PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants. For the reasons below, we hold that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants against plaintiff Waddle and affirm the summary judgment against plaintiff Simpson.

*131Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(e) (1983), a motion for summary judgment shall be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Pleasants v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Hicks v. ReavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waddle v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Bryant v. Thalhimer Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Watson Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Price Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Waddle v. SparksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API