Legal Opinion
Stanacard, LLC v. Rebtel Networks, Ab
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 6, 2010No. 08 Civ. 4859PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stanacard, LLC (“Plaintiff’ or “Stanacard”) brings this action against defendants Rebtel Networks, AB and Rebtel Mobile, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Rebtel”) alleging infringement of 17 claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,346,156 (“the '156 Patent”): claims 1-4, 6-8, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20-22, 25, 30, and 35 (collectively, the “claims-in-suit”).
Pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instillments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), the parties have submitted briefing regarding their proposed construction of disputed terms contained within…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bose Corp. v. SDI Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Ferring B.V. v. Serenity Pharm., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Milliman, Inc. v. Gradient A.I. Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Molo Design, Ltd. v. Chanel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Molo Design, Ltd. v. Chanel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024