Legal Opinion
Molo Design, Ltd. v. Chanel, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 26, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01578Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MOLO DESIGN, LTD., Plaintiff, 21-CV-1578 (DEH) v. CHANEL, INC., MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant. AND ORDER DALE E. HO, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Molo Design, Ltd. (“Molo”) alleges that Defendant Chanel, Inc. (“Chanel”) infringed claims 1-3, 5-11, 13, 16, 18, 20-25, and 27 of United States Patent No. 7,866,366 (“’366 Patent”), as well as claims 1-10, 12, 14 of United States Patent No. 9,689,161 (“’161 Patent”). Joint Status Letter 1–2, ECF No. 82. The two terms at issue here1—“supports” and “self-supporting”—relate to claim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Boss Control, Inc. v. Bombardier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.