People v. Gahan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
i
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether a sentencing court may order a defendant to pay restitution to compensate all the victims who were defrauded by his criminal course of conduct, even though the specific criminal acts committed against some of these victims were not the basis of the defendant’s conviction. We hold that the Crime Victim’s Rights Act, MCL 780.766; MSA 28.1287(766), provides a sentencing court with the authority to order such restitution.
n
In early 1992, Barry Baldwin decided to sell his Wilderness trailer motor home. Baldwin entered into a consignment sales…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Lansing v. Township of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Negri v. SlotkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Gross v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. LuethMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. BowlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- PEOPLE v. McKINLEYMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. FawazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. LawMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.