Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Redevelopment Agency

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 19, 1973PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment, rendered by a state referee exercising the powers of the Superior Court, assessing at $73,400 the damages sustained by the plaintiff in the taking of his property by the defendant by eminent domain. We find no merit to the plaintiff’s attack on the court’s finding of fact nor to his claim that the court misapplied the income method of determining fair market value. It was an appropriate method under the circumstances, considering the general condition of the property and its location in an area which was the scene of violent rioting in 1967, 1968…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brothers, Inc. v. Ansonia Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Montanaro v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Feigenbaum v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Bristol v. MilanoConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
  3. Town of Newington v. Estate of YoungConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
  4. W.R. Associates of Norwalk v. Commissioner, Trans.Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  5. Housing Authority of Hartford v. Charter Oak Terrace/Rice Heights Health Center, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API