Mathis v. Redevelopment Agency
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment, rendered by a state referee exercising the powers of the Superior Court, assessing at $73,400 the damages sustained by the plaintiff in the taking of his property by the defendant by eminent domain. We find no merit to the plaintiff’s attack on the court’s finding of fact nor to his claim that the court misapplied the income method of determining fair market value. It was an appropriate method under the circumstances, considering the general condition of the property and its location in an area which was the scene of violent rioting in 1967, 1968…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brothers, Inc. v. Ansonia Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Montanaro v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
3Cited by18 opinions
- Feigenbaum v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Bristol v. MilanoConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Town of Newington v. Estate of YoungConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
- W.R. Associates of Norwalk v. Commissioner, Trans.Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Housing Authority of Hartford v. Charter Oak Terrace/Rice Heights Health Center, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.