Legal Opinion
W.R. Associates of Norwalk v. Commissioner, Trans.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 18, 1999No. File CV840070182SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
HON. SAMUEL S. FREEDMAN, HON. HUGH C. CUR-RAN, HON. GEORGE W. RIPLEY II, JUDGE TRIAL REFEREES.
This dispute between the plaintiffs, W.R. Associates of Norwalk and Guard All Chemical Company, Inc., and the defendant, the commissioner of transportation (commissioner), arises from the state’s condemnation of the plaintiffs’ property to construct a highway. The case has spawned extensive litigation.
On February 6, 1984, the state filed a certificate of taking for a portion of the plaintiffs’ property. The taking was a federal urban systems improvement project with the state, pursuant to…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Murach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Silver Creek Drain District v. Extrusions Division, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Trans. v. Marlton PlazaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rosa, No. Cv00 015 70 87 S (Nov. 27, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001