Legal Opinion

Dixon Et Ux. v. City of Cocoa

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 30, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C.J.

The City of Cocoa filed suit to enforce an alleged lien for unpaid taxes for the years 1928 and 1929. The bill alleged that the lands were assessed in the name of the owner and that the description and assessment on the assessment roll was as follows:

Amount of

“Owner Description Valuation Taxes

R. L. Dixon

All of lot 6, Robert Dixon’s Homestead, ex. to E. C. Johnson and Fairview Land Co.

$45,000

$585.00”

There was a demurrer filed» to the bill of complaint. By the demurrer the questions were raised as to whether or not the description used in the assessment roll was sufficient and whether or not.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wofford v. McKinnaTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Power v. BowdleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Green v. McGrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Jarrell v. McRaineySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  5. Crowley Bank & Trust Co. v. HurdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ranger Realty Co. v. HeftySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Mitchell v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Brickell v. PalbickeSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Newsom v. Belle Mead Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Crawford v. RehwinkelSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API