Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1972No. Civ. 12627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

The board of supervisors, auditor, and treasurer of Butte County appeal from a superior court judgment which ordered issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate commanding appellants to take all necessary steps to cause petitioner—a former district attorney of Butte County— to be paid, with interest, the sum of $5,247.21. That sum is the difference between (1) the total salary paid to petitioner as district attorney under the 1963 amendment of Government Code section 28126 1 for the period Sep tember 17, 1965, to January 3, 1967 (on which latter date he commenced a new term of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Ross v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Busch v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Helping Hand Home for Children v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Brooks v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Hawaii Government Employees' Ass'n v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Universal Cable Productions v. Atlantic Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Hawaii Government Employees' Ass'n v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API