Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1963No. 39921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

The defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions in this court on the grounds that (a) the evidence, which is partly in narrative and partly in stenographic form, has not been properly briefed, and (b) that the brief of evidence has not been properly certified. As to (a), it does appear that in the main there has been a substantial effort towards compliance with Code Ann. § 70-305. Since the rule prescribed therein is for the benefit of the court rather than the parties litigant, and since those immaterial portions of the record appearing in the brief of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Rowan v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  3. Carusos v. Briarcliff Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. v. SailorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ReardonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  2. Stinespring v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Liner v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Blanton v. MarchbanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Patat v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API