Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1962No. 39747PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

It should first be noted that while this plaintiff alleges that the facts contended for by its insured are not true, it does not seek a judgment relieving it from defending the action on the ground of failure to cooperate or fraud but rather affirms the contract and admits that under either set of facts contended for some liability attaches to it—that of either a primary or an excess carrier. “Where no facts or circumstances are alleged in a petition for declaratory judgment to show any necessity for a determination of any dispute to guide and protect the petitioner from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Davis & Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Shippen v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Pinkard v. MendelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Home Indemnity Company v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Patterson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  4. Zurich Insurance v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API