Legal Opinion
Phenix-Georgetown, Inc. v. Chas. H. Tompkins Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 1984No. 83-599PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
Phenix-Georgetown, Inc. (Phenix) appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of Chas. H. Tompkins, Inc. (Tompkins) on Phenix’s third-party complaint against Tompkins seeking breach of contract damages for losses suffered by Phe-nix, as lessor, when it was sued by its tenant, Weissbard & Fields, P.C. (Weiss-bard). Weissbard sued Phenix to recover damages for breach of lease conditions, particularly Phenix’s failure to provide adequate air conditioning, and constructive eviction. Phenix asserts on appeal that there are genuine issues of material fact outstanding…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Munsey v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bailey v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.