Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lord v. Mazzanati

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1999No. 99-163Published

1ConcurrenceRobert L. Brown, Justice

This is a particuXxJarly difficult case, because it is obvious that a clerical error was committed by the trial court in the original decree. But that is no reason for this court to reverse its interpretation of its own rules and throw precedent to the four winds. To do so simply dilutes the common law and places this court in the posture of deciding cases involving our rules on an ad hoc basis. I would not reverse the long line of recent authority on the point that the ninety-day time limit set out in Rule 60(b) applies to clerical errors in Rule 60(a). My preference would be to correct the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pugh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Phillips v. Jacobs Ex Rel. JacobsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Young v. GurdonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Ingram v. WirtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Jt Jackson v. Arkansas Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API