Legal Opinion
Mrozik Construction, Inc. v. Lovering Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 2, 1990No. C8-90-961PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Lovering Associates, Inc. challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for respondent Mrozik Construction, Inc., arguing that payment by the owner to the general contractor was a condition precedent to payment by the general contractor to the subcontractor.
FACTS
Appellant Lovering Associates, Inc. (Lov-ering) is a general contractor of commercial buildings. In 1986, Stratford Investments, Ltd. contracted with Lovering to construct two office buildings in a professional office development in Falcon Heights, Minnesota. Lovering executed several…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Peacock Const. Co., Inc. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- The Thos. J. Dyer Company v. Bishop International Engineering Company and General Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- A. J. Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- MidAmerica Construction Management, Inc. v. MasTec North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Harmon Cable Communications of Nebraska Ltd. Partnership v. Scope Cable Television, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Koch v. Construction Technology, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Design Basics, LLC v. Chelsea Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.