Legal Opinion
Heathcote v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 15, 1910PublishedCited by 24 opinions
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.
The defendant in error brought an action at law against the plaintiff in error, wherein it was sought to recover damages in the sum of $1,700.00. The declaration consists of only the common counts, but it appears that the alleged indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff was the balance of the purchase price for a certain gasoline engine and certain materials. The defendant filed five pleas, which were as follows:
“And now comes W. E. Heathcote, the defendant herein, by Wall & McKay, his attorneys, and for plea to the said declaration and to each and every count thereof, says',
*99First. That…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. HollisSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- McClinton v. ChapinSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Franklin Phosphate Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Huffstetler v. Our Home Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Hillsborough Grocery Co. v. LemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Hart v. MarburySupreme Court of Florida · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.