Legal Opinion

Reilly v. McAuliffe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This case comes here on the petitioner’s appeal from a decree disallowing an instrument purporting to be a codicil to the will of Mary A. Donovan, late of Brockton. The judge made findings of material facts and the evidence is reported.

The facts are in substance these. On August 4, 1948, Mary A. Donovan, hereinafter called the testatrix, executed her will. There was no contest with respect to this instrument and it was admitted to probate. After making pecuniary bequests amounting to $3,650 and bequests of certain personal effects, the testatrix under the twelfth clause of her will gave the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neill v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Wellman v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Barnum v. FayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Israel v. SommerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Goddard v. DupreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Bruno v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Cleary v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Tarricone v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Goldman v. KaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API