Legal Opinion
Barnum v. Fay
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 13, 1946PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The plaintiff seeks to set aside an instrument dated December 9, 1941, and amended October 16, 1942, *178purporting to transfer in trust to the defendant Brink certain property given to her under the will of her grandfather John A. Gale, alleging that she was induced to execute the indenture and amendment through the fraud and undue influence of her sister, the defendant Elizabeth B. Fay, and of her sister’s husband, the defendant C. Norman Fay, and further alleging that the defendant Brink assisted them in procuring the execution of said instruments. The three remaining defendants are the minor…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- City of Boston v. SantosuossoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Trade Mutual Liability Insurance v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Murach v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Matsushita Electric Corp. of America v. Sonus Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Flynn v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Cleary v. ClearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- In Re the Bible Speaks, Debtor. Elizabeth Dovydenas v. The Bible SpeaksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.