Legal Opinion
Bragston Realty Corp. v. Dixon
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 28, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1019OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Final judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
In this nonpayment proceeding to recover possession of a rent-stabilized apartment and arrears, the answer, filed in April 1998, asserted a claim of rent overcharge. In support of a motion for summary judgment with respect to this claim, tenant established that the annual apartment registration for 1987 was not filed until July 31, 1997 and that this registration showed an increase in rent from $174.75 in 1986 to $450 in 1987. Tenant claimed that under Rent Stabilization Law of 1969 (Administrative Code of City…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Zafra v. PilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Messina v. Lufthansa German AirlinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sirianni v. SirianniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Messina v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Stepping Stones Associates v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Crabtree v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Santa Cecilia v. IrizarryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001