Legal Opinion
Myers v. Frankel
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 7, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order modified by providing that tenants’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim is granted and judgment directed to be entered in favor of tenants in the sum of $139,220, and by striking the provision severing landlords’ “claim” for a rent increase; as so modified, affirmed without costs.
In March 1995, Lucie Myers commenced a holdover proceeding against tenants based on the termination of an alleged sublease. In an answer dated March 22, 1995, tenants asserted that Lucie Myers’ overtenancy was illusory and that they were actually rent-stabilized…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Zafra v. PilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Crimmins v. Handler & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hargrove v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Powell v. Park Lex. Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myers v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Thelma Realty Co. v. HarveyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
- Rockaway One Co. v. WigginsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- ATM One, L. L. C. v. AllicinoNassau County District Court · 2001
- Santa Cecilia v. IrizarryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001