Legal Opinion

Discipline of Volesky

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2025No. 30736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

#30736-SRJ

2025 S.D. 62

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** IN THE MATTER OF THE DISCIPLINE OF TUCKER VOLESKY AS AN ATTORNEY AT LAW **** ORIGINAL PROCEEDING **** THOMAS H. FRIEBERG of State Bar of South Dakota Beresford, South Dakota Attorneys for Disciplinary Board. MICHAEL F. TOBIN of Boyce Law Firm, LLP Sioux Falls, South Dakota Attorneys for respondent. **** ARGUED AUGUST 27, 2025 OPINION FILED 11/12/25 #30736 JENSEN, Chief Justice [¶1.] The Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of South Dakota initiated formal disciplinary proceedings against Attorney Tucker Volesky after…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Jack B. Buster, A. Lee Petersen v. Ronald E. Greisen Henry P. Head and David L. RatchyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re the Discipline of DorothySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Discipline of TidballSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Application of WiddisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Discipline of LaprathSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Discipline of VoleskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API