Legal Opinion

Foster v. Litman

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 29, 2020No. 0:19-cv-00260Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA BRADLEY W. FOSTER, Case No. 19-cv-260 (JNE/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROSS LITMAN and MARK PHINNEY, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. 68.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies the motion to amend. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated the present action by filing a Complaint against St. Louis County Sheriff Ross Litman (“Sheriff Litman”) and St. Louis County Deputy Mark Phinney (“Deputy Phinney”). (Dkt. 1.) On April 16, 2019, Sheriff…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API