Lustmann v. Lustmann
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Primarily this action is for an injunction to protect his right in what plaintiff claims is an easement by prescription in a private lane or cartway. The action was tried before the Honorable C. M. Tifft, late judge of the eighth judicial district. His decision was for defendants. While plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or new trial was pending, came the end of this life for Judge Tifft. That motion was heard and determined by his successor, Judge Moriarty, who so amended the findings of fact and conclusions of law as to reverse Judge Tifft on the merits and ordered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Seymour, Sabin & Co. v. CarliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Chase v. WhittenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Collins v. ColleranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- School District No. 1, Itasca County v. AitonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Wojahn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American LegionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Alstad v. BoyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.