Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Chandler
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The only question raised by this appeal relates to the finding of damage in the sum of $1,999.80 representing the decline in the market value of the plaintiff’s stock, from the date of the injunction to the date of the original decree dissolving the injunction. The purpose of the injunction bond was to protect the defendant Chandler from the order enjoining him from disposing of the stock. That order* dated July 8, 1920, enjoined him “from assigning, transferring, indorsing, pledging, hypothecating, or otherwise negotiating, disposing of,' or parting with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Girard v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Brett v. CooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Watson v. New Milford Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Walton v. WestwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Ex parte ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Food Pantry, Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- American Surety Co. v. WhiteheadTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Grant v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- DeCastro v. DeCastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.