Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sinclair

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 25, 1984No. Misc. (BV) No. 24, September Term, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

299 Md. 644 (1984)

474 A.2d 1338

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

JOHN HOWELL SINCLAIR.

Misc. (BV) No. 24, September Term, 1983.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 25, 1984.

Dennis A. Dooley, Waldorf, for respondent.

Glenn M. Grossman, Asst. Bar Counsel, Annapolis (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Annapolis, on the petition), for petitioner.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ.

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against John H. Sinclair, alleging violations…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MaranoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AskinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DemyanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API