Legal Opinion
Allen Friedman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1991No. 90-3337PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
In this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, Allen Friedman appeals the summary dismissal of his claims for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and false imprisonment. Friedman’s malicious prosecution claim is that the district court erred in finding the United States had probable cause to prosecute him for violations of the federal labor laws. Friedman asserts his false arrest and imprisonment claims are sufficient because his earlier indictment and conviction were set aside, even after affirmance by this Court, by the grant of a motion for a new…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Randall Mills v. Weakley BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Richard Fugarino, Jo Marie Fugarino and Marc A. Fugarino v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Consolidated Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Barbara Young and Kenneth Young, Grange Mutual Insurance Company, Intervening v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Jones v. City Of CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Jones v. City of CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.