Legal Opinion

Spencer v. James

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1895No. 1742PublishedCited by 6 opinions

4. Practice—Findings of Fact by Trial Court—Exceptions Below.—Complaint that the trial court’s findings of fact do not warrant the judgment because defective in not specifically finding certain facts involved, is of no avail where the record fails to show that any proper exception on this account was reserved below by bill of exceptions or by exception in the judgment entry, or that such objection was urged in the motion for new trial. 6. Same—Request for Additional Findings…

Read the full summary

4. Practice—Findings of Fact by Trial Court—Exceptions Below.—Complaint that the trial court’s findings of fact do not warrant the judgment because defective in not specifically finding certain facts involved, is of no avail where the record fails to show that any proper exception on this account was reserved below by bill of exceptions or by exception in the judgment entry, or that such objection was urged in the motion for new trial. 6. Same—Request for Additional Findings of Fact.—Where the trial court's findings of fact are defective in omitting to specifically find certain facts…

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

The appellee J. C. James, on May 2, ■1892, brought this suit, number 466, against the State Rational Bank and against W. J. Spencer, a resident of Ellis County, Texas, and appellant herein.

The allegations of the plaintiff’s petition are to the following purport: On and before December 18,1890, B. P. McFarlin & Co., a firm composed of B. P. McFarlin and R. M. McFarlin, were indebted to T. M. James & Sons, of Kansas City, Mo. On this indebtedness T. M. James & Sons recovered, on August 22, 1891, a judgment against B. P. McFarlin & Co., in the sum of $768.81. On December…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. LOUISA & MARIA SETONSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Blum v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Continental Insurance v. MillikenTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Dewing v. PerdicariesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Travellers' Ass'n v. Votaw.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Pesch v. First City Bank of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
  3. Halliburton v. Martin, District JudgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Edwards v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. National Live Stock Ins. Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API