Legal Opinion

Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf R. v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1940No. 28719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

It is first contended that the court erred in overruling the motion to quash the summons for the reason that the return thereof failed to negative the appointment of a service agent in the county where service was made, and under sections 178 and 180, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. St. Ann. §§ 165 and 167, the service was invalid. The return in this case shows service was made:

“By delivering in person a true and perfect copy of the within summons, duly certified, upon J. D. Puckett, agent of said defendant, at its office in Locust Grove, Mayes county, Oklahoma, who was the person having…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. PillsburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Kansas, Okla. & Gulf Ry. Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Kelley v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. BillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API