Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Reed

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1916No. 7587PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County ; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by Charles R. Reed against the St, Louis & San Francisco Raili.oad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER. C.

On the 24th day of April. 1914. Charles R. Reed instituted a suit in the district court of Muskogee county against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him while a passenger upon a motor car of the company running between Muskogee and Westville on the 4th day of April, 1914.

When tlie petition was filed in this case the attorney for the plaintiff below filed a prae-cipe for summons, directing the clerk of the district court to issue a summons, directed to the sheriff of Oklahoma county, to or for the defendant,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Kinkade v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. RaganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. PettieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Braden v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API