Legal Opinion

Mayo Clinic v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 7, 2018No. 0:16-cv-03113Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MAYO CLINIC, a Minnesota Corporation, on its own behalf and as successor in interest to Mayo Foundation, Case No. 16-cv-3113 (JNE/KMM) Plaintiff, ORDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. This case is before the Court on Defendant’s objection to a December 15, 2017 order from United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses. Based on a review of the record, the Court affirms the magistrate judge’s order. BACKGROUND Mayo Clinic (“Mayo”) alleges that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lisdahl v. Mayo FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Roble v. Celestica Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  4. Knutson v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  5. F.B. Blansett and Ethel Blansett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API