Legal Opinion

Austin v. Hemphill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The first ground relied upon for a reversal of the judgment is that the circuit court erred in refusing to dismiss the plaintiff’s cause of action for the reason that the justice’s court was without jurisdiction, and therefore the circuit court could not acquire jurisdiction on appeal. In making this contention, counsel relies upon § 6412 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, and Little Rock Brick Works v. Hoyt, 87 Ark. 313, and cases cited. Section 6412 reads as follows:

“ Ordinary actions shall be commenced by summons,but, before summons is issued, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Augusta Cooperage Co. v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Jacks v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Little Rock Brick Works v. HoytSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jeter v. EveretteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Prosser v. Ark. Baptist HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Stowell Electric Co. v. Blue Valley Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API