Legal Opinion

Augusta Cooperage Co. v. Plant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The appellee instituted this action against the appellant to recover damages for an alleged failure to comply with an oral contract. Appellee alleged that, on or about March 1, 1922, appellant entered into a contract with the appéllee to purchase all stave timber which the appellee could cut and remove to the bank of White River, in White County, Arkansas, during the year 1922, from the lands located, in what is called “Shadden Bend.” That appellee agreed to pay therefor $10 per M for all logs which would grade No. 1 and $7 per M for all logs which would grade No. 2; that, in compliance with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hinchman v. LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Burrows v. . WhitakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Becker v. HolmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Bass v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Gray v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Austin v. HemphillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API