Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Cox

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

General Assumpsit. Pleas, general issue, payment, and set-off. Trial by jury, September Term, 1879, Powers, J., presiding. The plaintiff offered in evidence a promissory note as follows : $100. For value received, we jointly, and severally, each as principal, promise to pay H. S. Benedict, or bearer, one hundred dollars, one day from date, with interest annually. ' I. N. Austin, Underhill, April 1,1876. Matthew Cox.

Read the full summary

General Assumpsit. Pleas, general issue, payment, and set-off. Trial by jury, September Term, 1879, Powers, J., presiding. The plaintiff offered in evidence a promissory note as follows : $100. For value received, we jointly, and severally, each as principal, promise to pay H. S. Benedict, or bearer, one hundred dollars, one day from date, with interest annually. ' I. N. Austin, Underhill, April 1,1876. Matthew Cox. The execution of the note was admitted, but the defendant objected to its admission in evidence, for that it did not support the declaration, — claiming that he was only surety,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, J.

I. The note offered in evidence was joint and several, and recited that “ each as principal ” signed the note; and although, as between themselves, one was principal and the other surety, so far as the creditor is concerned both are principals. Claremont Bank v. Wood, 10 Vt. 582. This case has ever been recognized as authority. The remarks of Bennett, J., in People's Bank v. Pearsons, 30 Vt. 711, were not intended to impugn its soundness ; but, on the contrary, it was expressly affirmed. And we think the profession would be reluctant to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Samuel Sprigg, in Error v. The Bank of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  2. People's Bank v. PearsonsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  3. President, Directors & Co. of Claremont Bank v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
  4. Dunham v. DownerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  2. Alexander v. ChevalierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Arbuckle v. TempletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  4. McNamara v. Pickett Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. Barton Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. BickfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API