United States v. Arturo Huizar-Velazquez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:
We address sentencing issues relating to evasion of duties.
FACTS
Arturo Huizar-Velazquez pleaded guilty to importing wire hangers without paying the proper duties. In 2008, the United States imposed antidumping duties on Chinese steel wire hangers to combat perceived “dumping” 1 in the United States. Wire hangers from exporters who did not apply for and receive separate rates were subject to a “PRC-Wide” rate of 187.25 percent. 2 Huizar-Velazquez evaded these duties by purchasing hangers in China, importing them to the United States for shipment to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Timothy Allen WennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Gumesindo MontanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Kupfer (Joseph)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015