Legal Opinion

United States v. Arturo Huizar-Velazquez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2013No. 11-50237PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:

We address sentencing issues relating to evasion of duties.

FACTS

Arturo Huizar-Velazquez pleaded guilty to importing wire hangers without paying the proper duties. In 2008, the United States imposed antidumping duties on Chinese steel wire hangers to combat perceived “dumping” 1 in the United States. Wire hangers from exporters who did not apply for and receive separate rates were subject to a “PRC-Wide” rate of 187.25 percent. 2 Huizar-Velazquez evaded these duties by purchasing hangers in China, importing them to the United States for shipment to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Timothy Allen WennerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Gumesindo MontanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Kupfer (Joseph)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API