Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 4, 1930No. 20420PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, C.
On November - -15, 1928, Wayne Swalley was employed by Swalley & Stoneburner, 'the petitioners herein, who were operating a wholesale and retaii meat market combined, being in the same room. They also operated a slaughter or packing house some distance away. The respondent, Wayne Swalley, was employed in the wholesale and retail store in which there was a two-ton ammonia refrigerating machine, a one-horse power centrifugal water pump, and a one-horse power sausage mill. It was the duty of the respondent, who was the son of one of the employers, to opérate all of' these machines, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Southwestern Grocery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Okmulgee Democrat Pub Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Dillon v. DillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Teague v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sunshine Food Stores v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Crown Drug Co. v. HofstromSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Enid Cemetery Ass'n v. GraceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Rose Hill Burial Park v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma Tire & Supply Company v. SummerlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955