Indiana State Symphony Society, Inc. v. Ziedonis
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion
Buchanan, P.J.
I concur in the result reached by the majority, but solely on the basis that once it was proved that Ziedonis had incurred mitigating damages, the burden was on him (not the Defendant) to prove that he also had expenses which otherwise would not have been incurred..
It has long been the rule' in Indiana that óiie wrongfully discharged must attempt to seek alternate employment in order to mitigate damages. . . '
*298... it is the duty of a person when unlawfully discharged to make reasonable effort to obtain work elsewhere, and that in no event can he recover more…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hamilton v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Hinchcliffe v. KoontzIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Inland Steel Co. v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Milhollin v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.