Wright v. Carson Water Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from order refusing to admit a note in evidence on behalf of plaintiffs and from the judgment, from District Court, Ormsby county, Richard Rising, District Judge. The facts necessary to base the opinion upon appear in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from order refusing to admit a note in evidence on behalf of plaintiffs and from the judgment, from District Court, Ormsby county, Richard Rising, District Judge. The facts necessary to base the opinion upon appear in the opinion. This is an appeal from an order of the district court refusing to admit in evidence the promissory note to recover judgment for the amount of which the action was brought, and also from a judgment in favor of the defendant for costs upon the objection of defendant. Respondent’s objection to the introduction of the note, as stated by counsel, is that it was…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Bonnifield, J.:
The original plaintiff, S. C. Wright, brought this action in the district court in and for Ormsby county against the Carson Water Company, a corporation, defendant, on a certain promissory note of date December 8, 1886, for the sum of $2,000, and interest, alleged in the complaint to be the note of said defendant, executed by its president and secretary. The complaint contains the usual and necessary allegations in such action. The answer of the defendant, as to the note, is confined to specific denials of the averments of the complaint. In March, 1892, the case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Edwards v. Carson Water Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tien Fu Hsu v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LovelessNevada Supreme Court · 1944
- LoBue v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Lanigir v. ArdenNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Andolino v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.