Andolino v. State

OPINION

The facts giving rise to appellants’ cause of action in this case have already been set forth by this Court in Andolino v. State, 97 Nev. 53, 624 P.2d 7 (1981). In our decision in that case, we held that respondents owed an affirmative duty to maintain the highways and keep them reasonably safe for the traveling public. Having determined that governmental immunity did not apply to respondents and that summary judgment in their favor was improper, we remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. We specified that the question of respondents’ negligence was a question…